Mark, It seems
1
to
me that the unscrupulous
Italian gentleman has steered clear of infringing the orderience. Both Trade Marks have an anchor, & both goods
Cement; and that is really all.
that
are Portland
all. I miagene
"the imitation in question had taken place withis country, Mersis Hiltont Co. would have had difficult
their case.
"with witint to deceive",
Rarcimblance is
منها
470
Jagree
in framing
me the thy witative
Lukaus
to clore
as
to
aurerin
a clox one
to a colourevle
unitatiai
2
am ce
I should profose to rebby sending them the coby of the
der it,
en an
the ask for, and fainting out that its marsions, & those of the Regulations made adaptation to the local conditions of the Inferial Act and the customs Regulations, and that Mr. Chamberlain conceives their objections would hold equally
in the cast
of the Superial Acts Regulations. propr.- Pa as we have the and from
/
But it might be well
as well as this funi, to Messrs Pears recently ask the Governor of the Ordinance has boved effective- especially in view of the doubt expressed on 20929/90.
he. Carlson
Can fese this
The Compan стел комода ва rulsbankal
A.F. 12/3.
Jam wichine to agree with
he. Jidlice that the directions
Greg Hilton to are somewher
farfetched. In the frein place,
althigh
in reamer highly probable that the offending
arqually denginee
trade mark was
Miner frett
bear to this desärefter
HFW.
heep Hilton's trademark. The
ong porn, in fact,
true open ouestion
wis seems
the
arbor & shield, which certaing
do resemble trefor. Kitton's, ouf with a difference".
Fort, an
the whole, I hardly think that
it can be descuber
resembling a trade
Q
"to weal
wark
#
theceleulered to deceive"
If con quee
Ibald be wichinned
to anown heaps to meat as
для purposch GM. Widdian, wen sang think in is meessay to write o the forr.
محسی
De Lucas
25/3
the previous minutes, and.
:
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.